UFO/UAPs: THE ETERNAL MACGUFFIN OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS

BETWEEN MASS HYSTERIA AND "FORMER" MILITARY PERSONNEL

In recent months, there's been a surge in talk about "inexplicable" sightings of drones and orbs in New Jersey, along with leaks from whistleblowers like Jacob Barber (a name too common to seem real). Anyone familiar with basic science knows that, while it's statistically likely that aliens have existed, exist, or will exist somewhere in the vast 2 trillion galaxies of the Universe—and not necessarily in humanoid form—it's completely impossible for them to have arrived on Earth.

Even if we hypothesized the existence of John von Neumann's self-replicating probes, the most logical hypothesis that doesn't involve interstellar travel by biological crews, cosmic radiation, and micrometeorites could render them useless long before they could gather resources to repair themselves. Additionally, over the millions of years these probes wander through space searching for scientifically or militarily interesting lands, during the replication process, errors could accumulate in the algorithms or in any hardware component, potentially compromising their function. Since it's a long-term project, the society that designed them could have become extinct before they find a habitable planet. Of course, a highly advanced and intelligent society would be fully aware of this possibility, and may be less motivated to fund a project whose actual results they will never see.

So, how "extraterrestrial" could these fragile contraptions observed in New Jersey be, considering they don't even resemble the much-discussed Oumuamua? Some suggest they're probes (also called "dandelion seeds") coming from a mothership, but it's an incredible coincidence that they always appear in the same spots, near military installations (Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, Picatinny Arsenal, Naval Weapons Station Earle, etc.). And if this mysterious "mothership" really exists, why hasn't it been detected by U.S. or European scientists, or even Chinese or Russian ones? Should we accept without question the claims of Avi Loeb and Sean Kirkpatrick, despite the lack of concrete evidence? With imagination, anything can be hypothesized—even the buttered cat paradox or the hollow Earth theory—but science is not a joke, and requires much more: an accurate mathematical analysis, a rigorous interpretation of the data, and thorough verification based on reproducible experiments confirmed by independent studies. Only if the initial hypothesis passes these criteria can it be considered a genuine scientific breakthrough or a fact. When we observe the facts rationally, it becomes evident that the origin of these objects is entirely human, probably military in nature. Testing new drones and aircraft is essential in an era like this, where coups and World War III are no longer a dystopian, unrealistic fear relegated to soft sci-fi, but a real possibility, where technological supremacy could be the decisive factor between victory and defeat, democracy and totalitarianism.

Visiting the Facebook group "New Jersey Mystery Drones - let’s solve it," with 85,000 followers, can help analyze how manipulable humanity is, what percentage is more skeptical and rational, and what fake profiles post—not only mentally unstable individuals but, plausibly, also government personnel undercover. This last detail is very interesting because it may help us understand how the American establishment intends to strategically use these aircraft. Among the many posts in recent days, there is one that recalls how an anonymous intelligence official told Tucker Carlson that the U.S. government shot down a Chinese satellite controlling drones over New Jersey. Of the roughly 20 comments on the post, fewer than 10% believe in the Chinese responsibility, and this is a signal not to be underestimated. Organizing anti-Chinese PsyOps in a potential large-scale war could be more problematic than many are willing to admit. Paradoxically, Americans believe more in the extraterrestrial hypothesis than the enemy one. Some commenters even go so far as to hypothesize that there is more to the air collision near the Potomac River, and that the Blackhawk was actually a drone or chasing an alien drone. Even though this is still a random statistical sample, not necessarily representative of a population, a sample inevitably affected by fake comments from those close to intelligence, it clearly emerges how people irrationally and hysterically believe in the extraterrestrial hypothesis, so much so that even those who point out that everything could be attributed to Zipline's tests in Half Moon Bay, citing factual data, have to deal with 19.05% of laughing emojis.

Obviously, we can't know with absolute certainty why the U.S. might have an interest in manipulating the masses, and probably, we will never know. Without a doubt, getting the people to disconnect from reality and throw smoke in their eyes by creating an imaginary enemy can distract more emotional individuals from the concrete problems that undermine national unity and security. But even though instinctive behaviors, "animal spirits," can be duly catered to or directed by state intervention, this strategy carries significant risks, considering the many enemies watching with due attention the events of foreign policy. Once the news becomes public, it's enough to assign one of the many spies to monitor the skies, take photos, and record videos. From the visual materials, it can be deduced how far along U.S. research is on Loitering Munition Swarms and Coordinated Drone Attacks. For example, the presence of multiple drones simultaneously, a fact confirmed by many witnesses, could suggest the use of swarming technologies, crucial for electronic warfare and neutralizing enemy defenses. Among the experimental drones compatible with this scenario are Perdix—micro-drones launchable from F-18 jets, able to coordinate like a true swarm; Coyote Block 3—used for electronic warfare operations and radar jamming; and Altius 600M—used for ISR missions and joint operations with other unmanned vehicles. In this regard, it is interesting to remember that during sightings, several electrical interference reports were made, including temporary loss of communication device signals. Reliable witnesses talk about the use of PteroDynamics XP-4 drones, developed for the U.S. Navy, especially useful for loading and unloading from moving ships. Other drones identified with certainty are HPGe, used to fly over large areas following grid patterns, searching for potential nuclear devices or dirty bombs, as part of a mesh network operating in the 200 GHz communication band. Clearly, the U.S. Defense Department is preparing for terrorist attack scenarios, and it's not unlikely that they want to send a warning to Russia, which has repeatedly threatened nuclear war.

REFERENCES:

1- https://www.fanpage.it/innovazione/scienze/unastronave-madre-aliena-potrebbe-essere-nel-sistema-solare-secondo-un-funzionario-del-pentagono/

2- https://www.facebook.com/groups/552059654373970/permalink/599407566305845/?rdid=fgZmiAi4G6MUJ76J&share_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fshare%2Fp%2F18k5THdfbU%2F#

3- https://www.facebook.com/groups/552059654373970/posts/606558458924089/?comment_id=606793745567227

4- https://tuzarapost.substack.com/p/drone-mystery-solved-us-military?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Image: Avrocar from the 1960s